Skip to content

File S7-2026-27/Issue 0042/38 days left

11. Bad Actor/pp. 66–70/17 CFR 228.104

Rule 104 — Regulation A’s disqualification, imported

The exemptions are unavailable if the issuer or any Rule 262(a) covered person would be disqualified under Rule 262. Pre-effective events do not disqualify; they must be disclosed, 506(e)-style. Waivers remain available. Corp Fin would get delegated authority to grant them.

II.A.5 Disqualification (Rule 104)

Lookback before effective date

Disclosure only

RFCs

40–42

Analysis

What the text does

Rule 104(a) cross-reads Rule 262. The covered-person list is the Regulation A list: issuer, predecessors, affiliated issuers, directors, executive officers, other officers participating in the offering, general partners, managing members, 20% voting-equity beneficial owners, promoters, paid solicitors and their GPs/directors/officers. Instruction: read every “Regulation A” in 262(a) as “Regulation Crypto Assets.”

The lookback does not reach events before the final rule’s effective date. Those events must still be described in writing to each purchaser a reasonable time before sale (or in the offering circular). Failure to disclose a pre-effective event does not destroy the exemption if the issuer did not know and, exercising reasonable care, could not have known. Reasonable care requires a factual inquiry; the nature of the inquiry varies with the facts. That is Rule 506(e) transplanted.

The alternatives section (pp. 268–269) floats two other designs: apply disqualification to pre-existing events, or narrow the lookback (e.g., misdemeanor lookback limited to the penalty period). The Commission kept 262 for consistency — issuers already running a 262/506(d) questionnaire can reuse it — and used disclosure rather than disqualification for the pre-effective stock of crypto-industry settlements.

Requests for comment

Numbered questions on this page

  1. RFC 40

    Is Rule 262 the right disqualification code to import?

    Desk If you wanted 506(d) instead, say why. The covered-person list is the delta.

  2. RFC 41

    Should pre-effective events disqualify rather than merely be disclosed?

    Desk Investor-protection comment. Costs: a large share of 2017–2024 issuers would be ineligible.

  3. RFC 42

    Is the reasonable-care inquiry instruction sufficient?

    Desk Ask for a token-holder / key-admin questionnaire illustration.

RCA publishes source-linked intelligence for professionals. Nothing here is a token-buying call, a legal opinion, or an “approved / safe / regulated” badge. Every material claim is dated. Incomplete files stay incomplete.